Before we can talk about man, I'd like to say a few words of how man was able to be on this planet at all. I will attempt to show that this world is not all there is. I am not a naturalist, but I do believe in, if I may say it like this, Theistic Evolution. You see I do not have a problem with religion and science working together. But I also believe that there was something bringing about evolution. You see, something had to be the first cause to start the process. There has to be an unmovable first cause. Impersonal + chance + time does not equal the cosmos.
Furthermore, I would not even be able to trust my own brain if everything that happened in the world was just time and chance. Let me summarize what I wrote in my essay named Miracles, "For our brains to be trusted, reason must come from outside itself. Rational thought cannot come from irrational causes." If Naturalism is true saying the words "I ought" is the same thing as "I itch." I can never say you ought not do that. My opinion is greatest. There is nothing outside people's opinion of right and wrong.
Just a quick note, in Pantheism, you would have no way of distinguishing right from wrong. There can be morals this way. If God is in everything, then you have no basis for right and wrong.
Here is a question for you, if you are a Naturalist. Why do humans imagine a transcendent God outside of ourselves? If we get hungry, we could imagine food to quench this hunger. That doesn't mean there is such a thing as food, but it does make it more probable. if we can have a hunger for something beyond ourselves, there is probably such thing as God.
I made a mistake on my first post saying I only worked for Oxford, chalk it up to old age. I did work at Cambridge for awhile. In 1954 the university made up a post for me named Medieval and Renaissance Literature. My first lecture was named, "Describing the Times", I wrote the following, "The gap between those which worship different Gods is not as wide as those that worship Gods and those which do not. Many people through time have worshiped some type of God. This also leads to me as to believe there is a God. This is not just a belief, but a hunger. I would say this God has left a God shaped whole in our hearts that he made for him to fill. This God would ten be outside our time, space, and I might even say loving. It cannot be impersonal force +time + chance. The universe, logic, and even the cosmos itself would not exist.
So, I am to say the Christian God must be the real God. The Bible tells us he made us in his own image. So, logically, people should want to image God. With the Christian God, we find logic, reasons for life and death, and love itself. Man is made in the image of God, and we get to mirror him. Without God, let me say again, there is no such thing as morals, basis for knowledge, or life itself.
Conclusion...what do we do?
Although some people who are told exactly what the Christian Doctrine is, will fight it, and deny it. I do think there are those whom will come to the table of Christ as a starving man before a hearty meal. When I write, my life is evangelism, not just apologetic. In my book "God in the Dock," I quote, "Most of my books are evangelistic...It would have been inept of me to preach forgiveness and a Savior to those who did not know they needed either." It is more important to bring one lost soul to salvation than to save all the books of medieval past. Humans are made Christians to pass on God's love to others. That is what humanity was created for.
What do you say? Agree...Disagree
Please let me know your feelings, I love to discuss Theology with others.